As the situation with the COVID- 019 virus continues, we want you to know that we are available to all our clients for phone consultations.
Fischer Legal Group
Don’t go it alone - call us today.
Phone Icon 212-577-9231 Phone Icon 888-8WHISTL Phone Icon 888-8WHISTL

False Claims Act case allowed for undisclosed body armor defects

A False Claims Act lawsuit has been revived involving the materials supplier Toyobo and the now-defunct Second Chance Body Armor Inc., which produced bulletproof vests that they knew could be defective. The federal General Services Administration brought a fraudulent inducement claim against the companies in 2015, but a prior federal judge had granted summary judgment (a decision without trial) to the manufacturers and then ruled again in their favor in 2016.

On a motion for reconsideration, a new federal judge ruled that the case can go forward. What the previous judge had failed to appreciate, the new judge ruled, was that the GSA would never have purchased the defective bulletproof vests if the companies had disclosed known defects as required by law. This is the essence of fraudulent inducement to enter into a contract.

There is evidence that both Toyobo and Second Chance were aware that the material Zylon, a plastic fiber used to make the vests bulletproof, can degrade when exposed to heat and humidity. Toyobo had begun talking up the virtues of Zylon to the government as early as 1995.

As early as 2001, however, Toyobo apparently knew this was an "extremely serious problem," according to the judge. Apparently, Zylon fibers can degrade by as much as 7 percent over two years, depending on the conditions.

Neither Toyobo nor Second Chance disclosed the defect to the GSA, however, according to the allegations. In fact, Second Chance affirmatively guaranteed their performance for a full five years.

As late as 2005, Toyobo denied the degradation and continued to state that Zylon could be used in safely in bulletproof vests.

"Toyobo's omission or omissions therefore constituted false representations for the purposes of the United States' fraudulent inducement FCA claim," the opinion reads.

The judge ruled that there was sufficient evidence to allow the government's False Claims Act lawsuit for fraud, fraudulent inducement and unjust enrichment to move forward.

It is unclear whether the government's claim in this case was revealed as the result of someone blowing the whistle. However, in many cases of alleged government procurement fraud, an insider at a private company notices the fraud and notifies the government. In such cases, the whistleblower can earn a percentage of whatever money is returned to government coffers as a result of their doing the right thing.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Get Started

End Your Stress Contact The Firm

Call our law firm today at 212-577-9231 or fill out the form to schedule a confidential consultation.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Fischer Legal Group
1740 Broadway
Suite 1500
New York, NY 10019

Phone: 212-577-9231
Map & Directions